Gormley v. Kirkland
61 N.E. 1138, 29 Ind. App. 440, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 216
Opinions
The conclusion reached by the trial court, as disclosed by the -record, is eminently correct, and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gormley v. Kirkland, 61 N.E. 1138, 29 Ind. App. 440, 1901 Ind. App. LEXIS 216 (Ind. Ct. App. 1901).
61 N.E. 1138 (Gormley v. Kirkland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kraus v. Montgomery
16 N.E. 153 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)
Richwine v. Presbyterian Church
34 N.E. 737 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Roeder v. Keller
35 N.E. 1014 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)
Taylor v. Calvert
37 N.E. 531 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Bennett v. Closson
38 N.E. 46 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Davis v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.
39 N.E. 495 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Midland Railway Co. v. Galey
39 N.E. 940 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1895)
Nutter v. Hendricks
50 N.E. 748 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1898)
Atkinson v. Williams
51 N.E. 721 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1898)
Brown v. Graham
60 N.E. 953 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)