Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America
151 A.D.2d 1048, 544 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8502
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 2, 1989·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Motion to dismiss denied, with leave to renew upon the argument of the appeal. Memorandum: An order resettling a prior order is appealable provided, however, that it "contain[s] a change that is a material one so as to be, in effect, a new determination, thereby creating a corresponding new right to appeal” (Matter of Kolasz v Levitt, 63 AD2d 777, 779; see, Singer v Board of Educ., 97 AD2d 507; May v May, 66 AD2d 918). PresenLCallahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America, 151 A.D.2d 1048, 544 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8502 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).
151 A.D.2d 1048 (Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sweeney v. Niagara Lutheran Dev., Inc.
2025 NY Slip Op 01758 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
Trans Med. Supply, Inc. v. Country Wide Ins. Co.
144 N.Y.S.3d 522 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Family One Chiropractor, P.C. v. Country-Wide Ins. Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
Biotech Surgical Supply, Inc. v. Country Wide Ins. Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019
Weksler v. Weksler
81 A.D.3d 401 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Long v. Cleary
273 A.D.2d 799 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)