Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America
This text of 151 A.D.2d 1048 (Gormel v. Prudential Insurance of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to dismiss denied, with leave to renew upon the argument of the appeal. Memorandum: An order resettling a prior order is appealable provided, however, that it "contain[s] a change that is a material one so as to be, in effect, a new determination, thereby creating a corresponding new right to appeal” (Matter of Kolasz v Levitt, 63 AD2d 777, 779; see, Singer v Board of Educ., 97 AD2d 507; May v May, 66 AD2d 918). PresenLCallahan, J. P., Doerr, Boomer, Green and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
151 A.D.2d 1048, 544 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gormel-v-prudential-insurance-of-america-nyappdiv-1989.