Gorman v. Woodbury
53 N.E. 373, 173 Mass. 180, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 1055
Opinion
The negligence, if any there was, was not that of the superintendent O’Brien, but of Murphy and his companion, who were at work driving wedges into the bank. These latter were fellow servants of the plaintiff, and, there being no claim that they were unsuitable persons for that work, the defendants are not answerable to the plaintiff for their negligence, either at common law or under the statute. Gouin v. Wampanoag Mills, 172 Mass. 222. Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gorman v. Woodbury, 53 N.E. 373, 173 Mass. 180, 1899 Mass. LEXIS 1055 (Mass. 1899).
53 N.E. 373 (Gorman v. Woodbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Desautels v. Cloutier
75 N.E. 703 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)