Gorman v. Trice
This text of 5 S.E. 129 (Gorman v. Trice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Trice brought his action against Gorman for the overflowing of his land by the erection of a mill dam, and [732]*732obtained a verdict. Gorman moved for a new trial, which the court refused; whereupon he excepted.
The facts of the case show that Gorman had paid Trice $100 for the privilege of raising his mill-dam ten inches. Instead of raising it ten inches', he raised it twenty-three inches; by reason ot' which the plaintiff’s land was damaged ; and he was awarded by the verdict $100 for the damages thereby sustained. We think the verdict was demanded by the evidence; and the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 S.E. 129, 79 Ga. 731, 1888 Ga. LEXIS 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorman-v-trice-ga-1888.