Gorman v. Smith

Supreme Court of Florida

Gorman v. Smith

207 So. 2d 683, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2360

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 6, 1968

DocketNo. 36842

StatusPublished

This text of 207 So. 2d 683 (Gorman v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gorman v. Smith, 207 So. 2d 683, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2360 (Fla. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1967. Our consideration of the petition, the records and briefs, and oral argument heard, leads us to conclude that the petition for certiorari should be and is hereby denied.

[684]*684Attorney’s fee in the amount of $350.00 is awarded to claimant’s attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, THORNAL, and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur. CALDWELL, C. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date September 19, 1967. Our consideration of the petition, the records and briefs, and oral argument heard, leads us to conclude that the petition for certiorari should be and is hereby denied.

[684]*684Attorney’s fee in the amount of $350.00 is awarded to claimant’s attorney.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, THORNAL, and ADAMS, JJ., and SPECTOR, District Court Judge, concur. CALDWELL, C. J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

207 So. 2d 683, 1968 Fla. LEXIS 2360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorman-v-smith-fla-1968.