Gorman v. Russell
18 Cal. 688, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 271
Opinion
Field, C. J. concurring.
When this case was here before, (13 Cal. 531) we intimated that if this association, in the acts complained of, retraced their steps on being advised of their duties, and admitted a member and removed the unauthorized restrictions upon the exercise of his rights as a member of the society, the Judge below would be authorized to refuse a dissolution and account. This course seems to have been pursued, and we think the decree of dismissal was right.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gorman v. Russell, 18 Cal. 688, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 271 (Cal. 1861).
18 Cal. 688 (Gorman v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Estate of Henderson
112 P.2d 605 (California Supreme Court, 1941)
Peck v. Eastern Star Homes
112 P.2d 605 (California Supreme Court, 1941)
Stefanazzi v. Italian Mutual Benefit Society
101 A. 1010 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1917)
Brown v. La Société Française De Bienfaisance Mutuelle
71 P. 516 (California Supreme Court, 1903)
Loubat v. Le Roy
15 Abb. N. Cas. 1 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)