Gorman v. Montgomery
This text of 83 Mass. 416 (Gorman v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case comes within Keith v. Kibbe, 10 Cush. 35. The plaintiffs’ book of original entries was inadmissible as to the only question in contention between the parties before the jury, which was, whether the work was done on the credit of the defendant.
The instructions of the court permitted the jury to weigh this evidence in connection with other facts in proof. As we cannot know that it did not materially influence the verdict, the defendant is entitled to a new trial. Exceptions sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
83 Mass. 416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorman-v-montgomery-mass-1861.