Gorman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

212 N.E.2d 568, 350 Mass. 760
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided December 29, 1965·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Evidence that while the plaintiff was in the act of boarding the Authority’s trackless trolley at a regular stopping place, with one foot on the first step and the other on the second, and while she was holding her fare in one hand and her handbag in the other, the vehicle suddenly started forward, causing her to fall, entitled her to go to the jury. The plaintiff’s status was that of a passenger, Gordon v. West End St. Ry. 175 Mass. 181, 183, to whom the operator owed the duty to use reasonable care to afford her an opportunity to get fairly within the vehicle before he started it. O’Loughlin v. Bay State St. Ry. 221 Mass. 65, 66. See Tsacoyeanes v. Canadian Pac. Ry. 339 Mass. 726, 728.

Exceptions sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, 212 N.E.2d 568, 350 Mass. 760 (Mass. 1965).

212 N.E.2d 568 (Gorman v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Penfield v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
1992 Mass. App. Div. 27 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1992)
Walker v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
505 N.E.2d 566 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1987)
Mass Transit Administration v. Miller
315 A.2d 772 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1974)
Miller v. Mass Transit Administration
306 A.2d 261 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1973)