Gorman v. Grand Central Building, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Gorman v. Grand Central Building, Inc.

239 N.E.2d 655, 22 N.Y.2d 821, 292 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1269

New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1968·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Bergan and Keating dissent and vote to reinstate the verdict for the plaintiff as directed by the trial court, upon the ground that the defendants violated the clear mandate of section 241-a of the Labor Law, enacted to protect workmen engaged in this type of work. (See Joyce v. Rumsey Realty Cory., 17 N Y 2d 118, construing a similar statute, Labor Law, former § 241, subd. 1.) Taking no part: Judge Burke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, without costs, on the opinion at the Appellate Division.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Scileppi, Breitel and Jasen. Judges Bergan and Keating dissent and vote to reinstate the verdict for the plaintiff as directed by the trial court, upon the ground that the defendants violated the clear mandate of section 241-a of the Labor Law, enacted to protect workmen engaged in this type of work. (See Joyce v. Rumsey Realty Cory., 17 N Y 2d 118, construing a similar statute, Labor Law, former § 241, subd. 1.) Taking no part: Judge Burke.

Gorman v. Grand Central Building, Inc., 239 N.E.2d 655, 22 N.Y.2d 821, 292 N.Y.S.2d 916, 1968 N.Y. LEXIS 1269 (N.Y. 1968).

Pincite

239 N.E.2d 655 (Gorman v. Grand Central Building, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related