Gorman v. Doyle
This text of 262 A.D. 857 (Gorman v. Doyle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action for a money judgment for the unsMllfulness and misrepresentation of defendants, as attorneys, causing plaintiffs, as administrators, to include in their account an exorbitant sum for legal services, plaintiffs appeal from an order dismissing their complaint for insufficiency. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The provisions of the decree charging the expenses of the reference to the estate rather than to the defendants personally, as alleged in the complaint itself, constitute a judicial determination of a court of competent jurisdiction. The appeal by defendant Hirsch from the order denying resettlement is dismissed, without costs. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 857, 28 N.Y.S.2d 169, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorman-v-doyle-nyappdiv-1941.