Gorman v. COLOSKY

Michigan Supreme Court

Gorman v. COLOSKY

725 N.W.2d 350, 477 Mich. 982

Michigan Supreme Court·Decided January 4, 2007·No. 132407·Published

Opinion

725 N.W.2d 350 (2007)

Mark GORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rena COLOSKY, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132407. COA No. 268650.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 4, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

725 N.W.2d 350 (2007)

Mark GORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rena COLOSKY, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 132407. COA No. 268650.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

January 4, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 15, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

Gorman v. COLOSKY, 725 N.W.2d 350, 477 Mich. 982 (Mich. 2007).

Pincite

725 N.W.2d 350 (Gorman v. COLOSKY) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Mark GORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rena COLOSKY, Defendant-Appellee.

Mark GORMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Rena COLOSKY, Defendant-Appellee.