Gorman, Naim & Musa v. ABJ Fire Protection, Inc.

195 A.D.2d 1062, 601 N.Y.S.2d 883
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 16, 1993
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished

This text of 195 A.D.2d 1062 (Gorman, Naim & Musa v. ABJ Fire Protection, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gorman, Naim & Musa v. ABJ Fire Protection, Inc., 195 A.D.2d 1062, 601 N.Y.S.2d 883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court’s order directing a deposition of plaintiffs’-third-party defendants’ expert limited to his factual observations was not an abuse of discretion under the special circumstances existing here (see, CPLR 3101 [d] [1] [iii]; Rosario v General Motors Corp., 148 AD2d 108; Morrison v Ellis, 91 AD2d 1172; see also, Krygier v Airweld, Inc., 176 AD2d 700). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J.— Protective Order.) Present—Pine, J. P., Fallon, Boomer, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Morrison v. Ellis
91 A.D.2d 1172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Rosario v. General Motors Corp.
148 A.D.2d 108 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Krygier v. Airweld, Inc.
176 A.D.2d 700 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 A.D.2d 1062, 601 N.Y.S.2d 883, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorman-naim-musa-v-abj-fire-protection-inc-nyappdiv-1993.