Gorko v. State
This text of 199 So. 2d 132 (Gorko v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant was informed against, tried and convicted of the crime of assault with intent to commit rape. On this appeal the only points presented are directed to the sufficiency of the evidence. [133]*133The argument is directed to two elements: criminal intent and lack of consent. The proof is sufficient in each instance. As to criminal intent see: St. Giorge v. State, Fla. 1956, 92 So.2d 612; Gilchrist v. State, Fla. App.1965, 177 So.2d 777. As to resistance necessary to show lack of consent see: Gadsden v. State, 77 Fla. 627, 82 So. 50 (1919); Seely v. State, Fla.App.1966, 191 So.2d 78.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
199 So. 2d 132, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gorko-v-state-fladistctapp-1967.