Gorham v. Toomey

9 Cal. 77
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

This action was instituted in the Twelfth District Court, to enjoin proceedings under a judgment of the Superior Court of San Francisco.

In Ricketts and Wife v. Johnson, (decided in April, 1857,) we held that, under our system, the District Courts had no power to restrain the execution of the judgments or orders of Courts of co-ordinate jurisdiction, and that all proceedings to enjoin judgments must be issued from the Court having the control of such judgments.

By the act of March, 1857, abolishing the Superior Court, all judgments and actions pending therein were transferred to the Fourth District Court, which tribunal is fully competent to afford the plaintiffs all the relief to which they are entitled.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gorham v. Toomey, 9 Cal. 77 (Cal. 1858).

9 Cal. 77 (Gorham v. Toomey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Superior Court
110 P.2d 529 (California Court of Appeal, 1941)
Monagas v. Rivera
33 P.R. 570 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1924)
Benítez v. Portela
27 P.R. 839 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1919)
Estate of Iglesias v. Bolívar
11 P.R. 548 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1906)
Cochrane v. McDonald
5 Coffey 235 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1895)
De Godey v. Godey
39 Cal. 157 (California Supreme Court, 1870)
Crowley v. Davis
37 Cal. 268 (California Supreme Court, 1869)
Pixley v. Huggins
15 Cal. 127 (California Supreme Court, 1860)