Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Weintraub
176 F. 1024, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5299
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Weintraub. Read the opinion of the Court — 176 F. 927 →
Opinion
The complaint as it now stands avers, among other things, that defendants have affixed to the silver plated ware sold by them a mark substantially the same as that employed by complainant. This seems broad enough to admit proof of infringing marks which are not Chinese copies. Motion to amend is denied, except as to the averments of citizenship.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Weintraub, 176 F. 1024, 1910 U.S. App. LEXIS 5299 (circtsdny 1910).
176 F. 1024 (Gorham Mfg. Co. v. Weintraub) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.