Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. Wendell
260 U.S. 708, 43 S. Ct. 166, 67 L. Ed. 474, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2513
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. Wendell. Read the opinion of the Court — 261 U.S. 1 →
Opinion
Order: On consideration of the motion to substitute parties appellees, It is ordered that a rule to show cause why the case as to the Comptroller should not be dismissed, in view of Irwin v. Wright, 258 U. S. 219, and United States v. Butterworth, 169 U. S. 600, shall issue.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. Wendell, 260 U.S. 708, 43 S. Ct. 166, 67 L. Ed. 474, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2513 (1923).
260 U.S. 708 (Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. Wendell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States Ex Rel. Bernardin v. Butterworth
169 U.S. 600 (Supreme Court, 1898)
Irwin v. Wright
258 U.S. 219 (Supreme Court, 1922)