Gore v. Tacoma Police Department

Opinion

1 2 3

5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 JERMAINE GORE, CASE NO. C18-5075 BHS 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING REPORT 9 v. AND RECOMMENDATION 10 TACOMA POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 11 Defendants. 12

13 This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) 14 of the Honorable Theresa L. Fricke, United States Magistrate Judge, Dkt. 76, and 15 Plaintiff Jermaine Gore’s (“Gore”) objections to the R&R, Dkt. 77. 16 On October 14, 2020, Judge Fricke issued the R&R recommending that the Court 17 grant Defendants’ motion for summary judgment because Gore’s claims are barred by 18 Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), and that Gore’s in forma pauperis status be 19 revoked for purposes of appeal. Dkt. 76. On October 29, 2020, Gore filed objections. 20 Dkt. 77. On November 12, 2020, Defendants responded. Dkt. 78. Gore did not reply. 21 The district judge must determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s 22 disposition that has been properly objected to. The district judge may accept, reject, or 1 modify the recommended disposition; receive further evidence; or return the matter to the 2 magistrate judge with instructions. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). 3 In this case, Gore objections are without merit. His § 1983 claims challenge the

4 legality of his arrest, search, and convictions. These claims are squarely barred by Heck. 5 Therefore, the Court having considered the R&R, Gore’s objections, and the remaining 6 record, does hereby find and order as follows: 7 (1) The R&R is ADOPTED; 8 (2) Defendants’ motion is GRANTED;

9 (3) Gore’s in forma pauperis status is REVOKED for purposes of appeal; and 10 (4) The Clerk shall enter a JUDGMENT and close the case. 11 Dated this 30th day of November, 2020. A 12 13 BENJAMIN H. SETTLE 14 United States District Judge

15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22