Gore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gore v. State

260 So. 2d 218, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6927

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 6, 1972

DocketNo. Q-41

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 260 So. 2d 218 (Gore v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gore v. State, 260 So. 2d 218, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6927 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant appeals from the order denying his motion to vacate the judgment and sentence received for the offense of robbery.

We have previously considered and ruled upon the same issue raised in appellant’s motion to vacate in our review of the direct appeal of this cause. Gore v. State, 237 So.2d 243 (Fla.App. 1st, 1970). As stated by this Court in Carter v. State, 242 So.2d 737, at 738 (Fla.App. 1st, 1970):

“Questions which have been considered and disposed of on a direct appeal of a judgment of conviction and sentence will not be considered as grounds for post-conviction relief sought pursuant to Rule 1.850, Rules of Criminal Procedure,

Accordingly, the order appealed herein is affirmed.

SPECTOR, C. J., and WIGGINTON and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI