Gore v. Ray

Michigan Supreme Court

Gore v. Ray

36 N.W. 739, 69 Mich. 114, 1888 Mich. LEXIS 707

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 2, 1888

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 36 N.W. 739 (Gore v. Ray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gore v. Ray, 36 N.W. 739, 69 Mich. 114, 1888 Mich. LEXIS 707 (Mich. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Long, J.

This is a proceeding upon a petition to a circuit court commissioner of Berrien county to dissolve a writ of attachment.

The proceedings, after hearing before the commissioner, were removed by appeal to the circuit court for said county, and, upon a hearing there by the court before a jury, the attachment was dissolved. The respondent brings the cause to this Court on a writ of error.

This writ is not the proper remedy. It is not a proceeding according to the course of the common law, but is a special proceeding under the statute. Gray v. York, 44 Mich. 415 (6 N. W. Rep. 874). The writ of error must be dismissed.

The other Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI