Gore v. Herring

60 A. 1110, 72 N.J.L. 423, 43 Vroom 423, 1905 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 67
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 12, 1905
StatusPublished

This text of 60 A. 1110 (Gore v. Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gore v. Herring, 60 A. 1110, 72 N.J.L. 423, 43 Vroom 423, 1905 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 67 (N.J. 1905).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

This was an action of trespass for entering the close of the plaintiff and felling a tree. By the state of the case for appeal it appears that the District Court found as a fact that the plaintiff was seized of the close. As nothing to the contrary appears, this finding must be taken as founded upon competent testimony. Neither the jurisdiction of the District Court nor the act to amend the act creating that court (Pamph. L. 1902, p. 368) are drawn into controversy. The further findings of fact conclude the case upon its merits.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A. 1110, 72 N.J.L. 423, 43 Vroom 423, 1905 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 67, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gore-v-herring-nj-1905.