Gore Et Ux. v. Tagarelli Bros.

144 So. 662, 107 Fla. 301
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 22, 1932·Published

Opinions

Davis, Commissioner.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the court upon the transcript of the record of the judgment herein and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the court that there is no error in the said judgment. It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the court that the said judgment of the circuit court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Buford, C.J. and Whitfield, Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur. Ellis and Brown, J.J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gore Et Ux. v. Tagarelli Bros., 144 So. 662, 107 Fla. 301 (Fla. 1932).

144 So. 662 (Gore Et Ux. v. Tagarelli Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.