Gordy v. Sumner

260 S.E.2d 384, 151 Ga. App. 430, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2560
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided September 20, 1979·No. 57874·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Smith, Judge.

In this case before us by interlocutory review, the trial court granted appellants’ motion to add appellee Robert L. Sumner as a party to their action, originally brought against Brady Sumner and Cecil Kimble. Although the permitted amendment to the complaint, with summons attached, was served upon appellee, there was no court order requiring appellee to file an answer. Contrary to appellants’ contentions, it follows that appellee was never in default and that the court properly allowed appellee to appear and defend. Diaz v. First Nat. Bank, 144 Ga. App. 582 (2) (241 SE2d 467) (1978).

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian, P.J., andBirdsong, J., concur. *431 Fred W. Rigdon, Jr., for appellants. Larkin M. Fowler, Jr., James C. Whelchel, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordy v. Sumner, 260 S.E.2d 384, 151 Ga. App. 430, 1979 Ga. App. LEXIS 2560 (Ga. Ct. App. 1979).

260 S.E.2d 384 (Gordy v. Sumner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sondi Moore-Waters v. Met-Test, LLC.
782 S.E.2d 848 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2016)
Random Access, Inc. v. Atlanta Datacom, Inc.
501 S.E.2d 610 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1998)
Hamelberg v. National Ass'n of Government Employees
471 S.E.2d 283 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1996)
Chan v. W-East Trading Corp.
403 S.E.2d 840 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1991)