Gordon's Transports, Inc. v. Best Truck Lines, Inc.

524 S.W.2d 43, 1975 Mo. App. LEXIS 1629
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 2, 1975
DocketNo. KCD 26456
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 524 S.W.2d 43 (Gordon's Transports, Inc. v. Best Truck Lines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon's Transports, Inc. v. Best Truck Lines, Inc., 524 S.W.2d 43, 1975 Mo. App. LEXIS 1629 (Mo. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a suit by Gordon’s Transports, Inc., a corporation, for interline charges due it against defendant Best Truck Lines, Inc., which charges were incurred while defendant’s charter was forfeited in the state of Kansas. Defendant appeals from the judgment of the circuit court in favor of plaintiff in the amount of one thousand four hundred and forty-three dollars and thirty-three cents ($1,443.33), plus costs.

Defendant Best’s position on this appeal is, first, the trial court lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter of the litigation and to render judgment against a corporation which was nonexistent at the time the interline freight bills were incurred; that the former officer and owner, Isham, acted as statutory trustee under Section 351.525, RSMo 1969, V.A.M.S., during the period of forfeiture ; and that the corporation was not “recreated retroactively” when its charter was reinstated December 9, 1969; and second, neither the nonexistent corporation nor anyone acting in its place assumed the debts created by the former officer and owner, Isham, for interline service used by him.

These precise issues were decided adversely to defendant in Riley v. Best Truck Lines, Inc., 510 S.W.2d 229 (Mo.App.1974) (suit to recover insurance premiums); and Pacific Intermountain Express Co. v. Best Truck Lines, Inc., 518 S.W.2d 469 (Mo.App.1974).

No error of law appears, and therefore the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. An extended opinion in this cause would have no precedential value. Rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
524 S.W.2d 43, 1975 Mo. App. LEXIS 1629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordons-transports-inc-v-best-truck-lines-inc-moctapp-1975.