Gordon & Wood v. Valentine & Smedes
16 Johns. 145
This text of 16 Johns. 145 (Gordon & Wood v. Valentine & Smedes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gordon & Wood v. Valentine & Smedes, 16 Johns. 145 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1819).
Opinion
The teste of these writs was irregular. Where writs are issued in vacation, they may be tested of the preceding term ; if issued in term, they must be tested of some day in the same term. (1 N. R. L. 318.) But the plaintiff may amend his writs on payment of costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Whitney v. Brunette
15 Wis. 61 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1862)
Jones v. Cook
1 Cow. 309 (New York Supreme Court, 1823)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 Johns. 145, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-wood-v-valentine-smedes-nysupct-1819.