Gordon v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.

1923 OK 529, 218 P. 148, 95 Okla. 148, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 113
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedJuly 24, 1923
Docket14285
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1923 OK 529 (Gordon v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. W. T. Rawleigh Co., 1923 OK 529, 218 P. 148, 95 Okla. 148, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 113 (Okla. 1923).

Opinion

HARRISON, J.

This case is disposed of on motion of defendant in error to dismiss appeal.

It appears from the record that on January 2, 1923, an order was made granting an extension of 60 days from said date in which to complete and serve case-made; this extension expired March 3, 1923. On March 6, 1923, another order was made purporting to grant further extension. The court was without power on March 6 to grant a further extension, the period of the former order having expired on a date prior to March 6th: therefore the purported order made on March 6th was without authority and void. Montooth v. Smith, 85 Okla. 43, 203 Pac. 214; Brittain v. Lorett, 85 Okla. 49, 204 Pac. 438.

An order purporting to grant an extension of time in which to make and serve case-made for appeal to the Supreme Court, made after the expiration of the time formerly allowed, is a nullity, and an appeal based upon service of a case-made thereunder will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

JOHNSON, C. J., and KANE, KENNA-MER, and COCHRAN, ,TJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Winn v. Willmott
1929 OK 33 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1923 OK 529, 218 P. 148, 95 Okla. 148, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-w-t-rawleigh-co-okla-1923.