Gordon v. Visone

247 A.D. 757

Opinion

Action to restrain defendants from conducting a business similar to that conducted by plaintiff, a lessee of one of the defendants. The complaint was dismissed, without testimony being taken, on the ground that it did not state a cause of action. Order dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co. (265 N. Y. 1); Tuttle v. Buck (107 Minn. 145; 119 N. W. 946); Dunshee v. Standard Oil Co. (152 Iowa, 618, 624; 132 N. W. 371; 36 L. R. A. [N. S.] 263); Amer. Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Bank (256 U. S: 350). Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. Visone, 247 A.D. 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

247 A.D. 757 (Gordon v. Visone) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.
191 N.E. 713 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Dunshee v. Standard Oil Co.
132 N.W. 371 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
Tuttle v. Buck
119 N.W. 946 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)