Gordon v. Visone

247 A.D. 757

This text of 247 A.D. 757 (Gordon v. Visone) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. Visone, 247 A.D. 757 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Action to restrain defendants from conducting a business similar to that conducted by plaintiff, a lessee of one of the defendants. The complaint was dismissed, without testimony being taken, on the ground that it did not state a cause of action. Order dismissing the complaint reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co. (265 N. Y. 1); Tuttle v. Buck (107 Minn. 145; 119 N. W. 946); Dunshee v. Standard Oil Co. (152 Iowa, 618, 624; 132 N. W. 371; 36 L. R. A. [N. S.] 263); Amer. Bank & Trust Co. v. Federal Bank (256 U. S: 350). Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Al Raschid v. News Syndicate Co.
191 N.E. 713 (New York Court of Appeals, 1934)
Dunshee v. Standard Oil Co.
132 N.W. 371 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1911)
Tuttle v. Buck
119 N.W. 946 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
247 A.D. 757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-visone-nyappdiv-1936.