Gordon v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 22, 1997·No. 97-6595·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6595

PAUL C. GORDON, a/k/a Troy Hilton, a/k/a Paul Jappal, a/k/a Star, a/k/a "G",

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-93-85)

Submitted: September 11, 1997 Decided: September 22, 1997

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Paul C. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. David T. Maguire, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his mo-

tion for the production of trial transcript at government expense.

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Gordon v. United States, No. CR-93-85 (E.D. Va. Apr. 4, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. United States, (4th Cir. 1997).

Gordon v. United States (Gordon v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.