Gordon v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gordon v. State

95 So. 3d 323, 2012 WL 2913225, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11687

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 18, 2012

DocketNo. 4D11-876

StatusPublished

This text of 95 So. 3d 323 (Gordon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gordon v. State, 95 So. 3d 323, 2012 WL 2913225, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11687 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Gordon appeals his conviction for armed robbery of the First Peoples Bank in Vero Beach. He asserts that the trial court erred by not suppressing the confession he made to law enforcement officials arguing that he confessed because of a promise to prosecute him in federal court only. We find no error in the trial court’s conclusion that no such promise was made and that even if one were made, Gordon’s confession was not involuntary based on the totality of the circumstances. We write specifically to commend the trial court’s analysis contained in its thirteen-page order denying Gordon’s motion to suppress.¹

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jamie Gordon appeals his conviction for armed robbery of the First Peoples Bank in Vero Beach. He asserts that the trial court erred by not suppressing the confession he made to law enforcement officials arguing that he confessed because of a promise to prosecute him in federal court only. We find no error in the trial court’s conclusion that no such promise was made and that even if one were made, Gordon’s confession was not involuntary based on the totality of the circumstances. We write specifically to commend the trial court’s analysis contained in its thirteen-page order denying Gordon’s motion to suppress.¹

Affirmed.

MAY, C.J., TAYLOR and CIKLIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 So. 3d 323, 2012 WL 2913225, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 11687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.