Gordon v. State

804 So. 2d 441, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15034, 2001 WL 1267642
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gordon v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 787 So. 2d 892
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 24, 2001·No. No. 4D01-3450·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of petitioner’s rule 3.800(a) motion.

Petitioner, Willie Gordon, raised in his January 20, 2001 motion to correct illegal sentence the same claim previously raised and rejected by the circuit court in two prior motions to correct sentence. The circuit court’s rulings were affirmed by this court in Gordon v. State, 727 So.2d 939 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), and Gordon v. State, 699 So.2d 1387 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). This latest appeal is procedurally barred and any future pro se petition or appeal raising the same issues previously resolved in this court will constitute an abuse of the judicial system, for which sanctions may be imposed. See Prince v. State, 719 So.2d [442]*442346, 347 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), rev. denied, 732 So.2d 328 (Fla.1999).

AFFIRMED.

FARMER, SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. State, 804 So. 2d 441, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 15034, 2001 WL 1267642 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

804 So. 2d 441 (Gordon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prince v. State
719 So. 2d 346 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)