Gordon v. State
This text of 688 So. 2d 995 (Gordon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Casey S. GORDON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
Casey S. Gordon, Madison, Pro Se.
No Appearance for Appellee.
W. SHARP, Judge.
We dismiss this appeal sua sponte for lack of jurisdiction, without prejudice to Gordon to bring an appeal upon complete disposition of the case below.
Gordon filed a motion with the trial court pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court denied his motion regarding seven grounds, but scheduled an evidentiary hearing for January 2, 1997, on Ground Vwhether appellate counsel was ineffective and Gordon was entitled to a belated appeal. According to later pleadings filed with this court by Gordon, the trial court held the hearing and granted Gordon a belated appeal. That appeal may moot the points raised in the Rule 3.850 motion, which were denied by the trial court. In any event, the appeal should be dealt with before any Rule 3.850 issues can be considered by this court.
In a similar circumstance, where a trial court denied some relief requested pursuant to a Rule 3.850 motion, but ordered an evidentiary hearing on other grounds raised by the motion, we held the ruling was not final and thus not appealable. See Gowins v. State, 662 So.2d 1348 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Accordingly, this appeal is sua sponte dismissed.
DISMISSED sua sponte.
THOMPSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
688 So. 2d 995, 1997 WL 82573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.