Gordon v. State
This text of Gordon v. State (Gordon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
ANTHONY GORDON, § § No. 194, 2024 Defendant Below, § Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § Cr. ID No. 1109011777 (N) STATE OF DELAWARE, § § Appellee. §
Submitted: June 17, 2024 Decided: August 26, 2024
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to
affirm, and the record on appeal, we affirm the Superior Court’s denial of the
appellant’s repetitive motion to dismiss the second-degree rape counts of the
indictment. We have previously considered and rejected the appellant’s arguments,
finding that “[t]he second-degree rape counts satisfied [Superior Court Criminal]
Rule 7(c) (which requires a plain written statement of the essential facts constituting
the offense charged), put [the appellant] on notice of the charges against him, and
precluded subsequent prosecution for the same offense.”1
1 Gordon v. State, 2022 WL 1486727, at *2 (Del. May 10, 2022). NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gordon v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-state-del-2024.