Gordon v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Gordon v. State

739 S.W.2d 539, 293 Ark. 546, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2419

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided November 16, 1987·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record in case CR-86-330 from Sebastian Circuit Court was untimely tendered because an order for an extension of time to file the record was obtained late. The attorney for appellant, James R. Marschewski, admits responsibility. This admission by defense counsel constitutes good cause for granting the motion. Per Curiam Order of February 5,1979, 265 Ark. 964. Accordingly, the motion for rule on the clerk is granted.

A copy of this order will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The record in case CR-86-330 from Sebastian Circuit Court was untimely tendered because an order for an extension of time to file the record was obtained late. The attorney for appellant, James R. Marschewski, admits responsibility. This admission by defense counsel constitutes good cause for granting the motion. Per Curiam Order of February 5,1979, 265 Ark. 964. Accordingly, the motion for rule on the clerk is granted.

A copy of this order will be sent to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Gordon v. State, 739 S.W.2d 539, 293 Ark. 546, 1987 Ark. LEXIS 2419 (Ark. 1987).

Pincite

739 S.W.2d 539 (Gordon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.