Gordon v. Southern Bank
19 Ind. 192
This text of 19 Ind. 192 (Gordon v. Southern Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gordon v. Southern Bank, 19 Ind. 192 (Ind. 1862).
Opinion
Accommodation indorsers of a promissory note governed by the law merchant, do not stand in the relation of sureties for the maker, for whose accommodation they became indorsers, within the meaning of our statute in relation to “ Remedies of sureties against their principals.” 2 R. S., 1852, p. 186.
The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bank of Conway v. Stary
200 N.W. 505 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1924)
Lacy v. Lofton
26 Ind. 324 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1866)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 Ind. 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-southern-bank-ind-1862.