Gordon v. Rombotis

238 P.2d 992, 38 Cal. 2d 879
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1951
DocketL. A. No. 21703
StatusPublished

This text of 238 P.2d 992 (Gordon v. Rombotis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. Rombotis, 238 P.2d 992, 38 Cal. 2d 879 (Cal. 1951).

Opinion

SPENCE, J.

This is a quiet title action presenting questions similar to certain questions determined in two cases this day filed, Scheas v. Robertson, L. A. No. 21357, ante, p. 119 [238 P.2d 982] and Sipe v. Correa, L. A. No. 21421, ante, p. 131 [238 P.2d 989]. Upon the authority of and for the reasons stated therein, plaintiff was correctly adjudicated a “bona fide purchaser for value” and entitled to rely on the conclusive presumption found in the 1945 amendment of section 2911 of the Civil Code.

The judgment is affirmed.

Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Carter, J., Traynor, J., and Schauer, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sipe v. Correa
238 P.2d 989 (California Supreme Court, 1951)
Scheas v. Robertson
238 P.2d 982 (California Supreme Court, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 P.2d 992, 38 Cal. 2d 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-rombotis-cal-1951.