Gordon v. Plonski

11 A.D.2d 693, 204 N.Y.S.2d 590
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 6, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 A.D.2d 693 (Gordon v. Plonski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. Plonski, 11 A.D.2d 693, 204 N.Y.S.2d 590 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the [694]*694Civil Practice Act, to set aside the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Huntington denying petitioner’s application for a special exception permit in a business use district whereby a parcel of real property could be used for a two-bay gasoline service station, the members of said Zoning Board appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered November 23, 1959, granting the petition, annulling said decision, and directing said members to issue the necessary permit. Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and petition dismissed, without costs. Findings of fact insofar as they may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. The Town Board could have forbidden automobile service stations entirely in a business zone. Instead, it permitted them as a special exception, provided the Zoning Board should find that the use will not cause undue traffic or fire hazards and will not adversely affect property values, and provided such Zoning Board shall determine that the exception is reasonably necessary for the public health or general welfare or interest. The Zoning Board did not make the required findings, but found to the contrary. On this record we are unable to say that the board’s determination was unreasonable or arbitrary. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Academy Mews, Inc. v. Kane
143 A.D.2d 960 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Zartman v. Reisem
59 A.D.2d 237 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 A.D.2d 693, 204 N.Y.S.2d 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-plonski-nyappdiv-1960.