Gordon v. O'Neil

Opinion

USCA1 Opinion

          September 4, 1992     [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]

___________________

No. 92-1037

REV. GERALD GORDON, ET AL.,

                               Plaintiffs, Appellants,

                                          v.

                               JAMES E. O'NEIL, ET AL.,

                                Defendants, Appellees.

__________________

                     APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

                          FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND

                [Hon. Raymond J. Pettine, Senior U.S. District Judge]
                                          __________________________

                                 ___________________

                                        Before

                                 Breyer, Chief Judge,
                                         ___________
                           Campbell, Senior Circuit Judge,
                                     ____________________
                               and Cyr, Circuit Judge.
                                        _____________

                                 ___________________

               Rev. Gerald Gordon on brief pro se.
               __________________
               James E.  O'Neil, Attorney General, and  Richard B. Woolley,
               ________________                         __________________
          Assistant Attorney General, on brief for appellees.

__________________

                                  __________________

Per Curiam.  We have reviewed the parties' briefs and the 
               __________

          record on appeal.   We affirm essentially for the  reasons stated
          in 
          the district court's memorandum and order, dated September 12, 

          1991, and entered on September 16, 1991.

               Affirmed.
               _________