Gordon v. Miller
This text of 158 Misc. 655 (Gordon v. Miller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the charge that plaintiff was entitled to a reasonable opportunity to repair the work done by him, we think defendant was entitled to the requested qualification that if the work had been so badly done that defendant had justifiably lost confidence in plaintiff she was not required to go back to him.
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Hammer and Shientag, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
158 Misc. 655, 286 N.Y.S. 163, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-miller-nysupct-1935.