Gordon v. Lynch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gordon v. Lynch

126 A.D. 942, 111 N.Y.S. 1121

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1908·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We think that there was a question of fact presented which should have been left to the -jury; and that the motion to that effect by the defendant was made in time. The judgment and order must be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin. Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

We think that there was a question of fact presented which should have been left to the -jury; and that the motion to that effect by the defendant was made in time. The judgment and order must be reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin. Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.

Gordon v. Lynch, 126 A.D. 942, 111 N.Y.S. 1121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

126 A.D. 942 (Gordon v. Lynch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.