Home/Second Circuit/Gordon v. Kleckner

Gordon v. Kleckner

131 F.2d 863, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedNovember 27, 1942
DocketNo. 101
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 131 F.2d 863 (Gordon v. Kleckner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. Kleckner, 131 F.2d 863, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975 (2d Cir. 1942).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Order affirmed on the opinion below, In re Gordon, 44 F.Supp. 581.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In the Matter of Patton Manufacturing Company, Debtor. The First National Bank of Cincinnati, Caribbean Container Company, Thechatfield Paper Corporation, Chemineer, Inc., Joseph G. Donohoo, the Meadcorporation, Smith & Schnacke, and Touche, Ross, Bailey & Smart v. Everett W. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Patton Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt, Patton Manufacturing Company, G.L.P., Inc., Patton Manufacturing Company,inc., and Juno, Inc. (The Corporate Name Now Changed to One Um, Inc.),plaintiffs-Appellants v. Everett W. Kimberling, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Patton Manufacturing Company, Bankrupt
413 F.2d 1258 (First Circuit, 1969)
First National Bank v. Kimberling
413 F.2d 1258 (Sixth Circuit, 1969)
In re WNCN, Inc.
246 F. Supp. 30 (S.D. New York, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 F.2d 863, 1942 U.S. App. LEXIS 2975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-kleckner-ca2-1942.