Gordon v. Herron

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gordon v. Herron

870 S.W.2d 478, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 283, 1994 WL 50131

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 22, 1994·No. No. 63670·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a negligence action for property damage resulting from an automobile collision. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence and no error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s judgment in a negligence action for property damage resulting from an automobile collision. The trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence and no error of law appears. Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976).

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Gordon v. Herron, 870 S.W.2d 478, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 283, 1994 WL 50131 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

870 S.W.2d 478 (Gordon v. Herron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related