Gordon v. Gray

19 Colo. 167
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 15, 1893·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

As the law governing appeals to this court existed at the time of the rendition of the judgment (June, 1890), this court was without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. The judgment did not. amount to $100, exclusive of costs, nor did it relate to a franchise or freehold. Code, § 388. By the act creating the court of appeals, the jurisdiction of this court to review money judgments rendered by district courts has been still further restricted. Session Laws, 1891, p. 118. Appeals are creatures of the statute; neither joinder in error nor the consent of parties can confer jurisdiction upon this court by appeal. See Harvey v. Travelers Ins. Co., 18 Colo. 354, and cases there cited; also, People v. Richmond, 16 Colo. 274.

The appeal sought to be taken herein is dismissed without prejudice.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. Gray, 19 Colo. 167 (Colo. 1893).

19 Colo. 167 (Gordon v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bresciani v. Haragan
968 P.2d 153 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1998)
Estate of Jordan v. Estate of Jordan
899 P.2d 350 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1995)
State ex rel. St. Louis Dressed Beef & Provision Co. v. Nixon
134 S.W. 538 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
Roseberry v. Valley Building & Loan Ass'n
17 Colo. App. 448 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1902)
Slattery v. Robinson
7 Colo. App. 22 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1895)
Bogert v. Adams
5 Colo. App. 510 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1895)