Gordon v. Gray
This text of 19 Colo. 167 (Gordon v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As the law governing appeals to this court existed at the time of the rendition of the judgment (June, 1890), this court was without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. The judgment did not. amount to $100, exclusive of costs, nor did it relate to a franchise or freehold. Code, § 388. By the act creating the court of appeals, the jurisdiction of this court to review money judgments rendered by district courts has been still further restricted. Session Laws, 1891, p. 118. Appeals are creatures of the statute; neither joinder in error nor the consent of parties can confer jurisdiction upon this court by appeal. See Harvey v. Travelers Ins. Co., 18 Colo. 354, and cases there cited; also, People v. Richmond, 16 Colo. 274.
The appeal sought to be taken herein is dismissed without prejudice.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 Colo. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-gray-colo-1893.