Gordon v. Gordon

764 N.E.2d 1035, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1505, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 715
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 20, 2002
Docket02-299
StatusPublished

This text of 764 N.E.2d 1035 (Gordon v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. Gordon, 764 N.E.2d 1035, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1505, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 715 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

Warren App. No. CA2001-04-033. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists; the parties are to brief the issue stated in the court of appeals’ Entry Granting Motion to Certify dated January 17, 2002:

“Where objections to a magistrate’s decision are filed in advance of the filing of the magistrate’s decision to which the objections apply, does the trial court err as a matter of law or abuse its discretion by overruling the objections as untimely?”

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent.

The conflict case is Koss v. Koss (June 29, 1982), Mahoning App. No. 81-C.A.-47, unreported, 1982 WL 6152.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
764 N.E.2d 1035, 94 Ohio St. 3d 1505, 2002 Ohio LEXIS 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-gordon-ohio-2002.