Gordon v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gordon v. Gordon

118 S.E. 643, 156 Ga. 106, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 210

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 20, 1923·No. No. 3795·Published

Opinion

Hill, J.

The uncontroverted evidence in this case supported the allegations of the libel for divorce; and the juiy having returned a verdict contrary to the uncontroverted evidence, the verdict for the defendant [107]*107was unauthorized, and the court below erred in refusing a new trial based only on the usual general grounds. Civil Code (1910), §§ 2945, 2946.

No. 3795. July 20, 1923.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., dissenting. Don. H. Olarlc, for plaintiff. II. G. Dulces, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

The uncontroverted evidence in this case supported the allegations of the libel for divorce; and the juiy having returned a verdict contrary to the uncontroverted evidence, the verdict for the defendant [107]*107was unauthorized, and the court below erred in refusing a new trial based only on the usual general grounds. Civil Code (1910), §§ 2945, 2946.

No. 3795. July 20, 1923.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., dissenting. Don. H. Olarlc, for plaintiff. II. G. Dulces, for defendant.

Gordon v. Gordon, 118 S.E. 643, 156 Ga. 106, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 210 (Ga. 1923).

Pincite

118 S.E. 643 (Gordon v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.