Gordon v. Gordon

Supreme Court of Georgia

Gordon v. Gordon

118 S.E. 643, 156 Ga. 106, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 210

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJuly 20, 1923

DocketNo. 3795

StatusPublished

This text of 118 S.E. 643 (Gordon v. Gordon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gordon v. Gordon, 118 S.E. 643, 156 Ga. 106, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 210 (Ga. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

The uncontroverted evidence in this case supported the allegations of the libel for divorce; and the juiy having returned a verdict contrary to the uncontroverted evidence, the verdict for the defendant [107]*107was unauthorized, and the court below erred in refusing a new trial based only on the usual general grounds. Civil Code (1910), §§ 2945, 2946.

No. 3795. July 20, 1923.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., dissenting. Don. H. Olarlc, for plaintiff. II. G. Dulces, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

The uncontroverted evidence in this case supported the allegations of the libel for divorce; and the juiy having returned a verdict contrary to the uncontroverted evidence, the verdict for the defendant [107]*107was unauthorized, and the court below erred in refusing a new trial based only on the usual general grounds. Civil Code (1910), §§ 2945, 2946.

No. 3795. July 20, 1923.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, G. J., dissenting. Don. H. Olarlc, for plaintiff. II. G. Dulces, for defendant.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

118 S.E. 643, 156 Ga. 106, 1923 Ga. LEXIS 210, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-gordon-ga-1923.