Gordon v. Gordon

932 So. 2d 393, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6692, 2006 WL 1699503
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 31, 2006·No. No. 4D06-952·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner challenges the trial court’s issuance of an amended writ of bodily attachment, which directs the Sheriffs of Florida to arrest him in Maryland and to bring him to Florida for a hearing to determine his ability to pay support following a contempt finding. We grant the petition as the language of section 61.11(2), Florida Statutes (2005), limits its application to Florida. See also § 30.15(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2005); Sanders v. Laird, 865 So.2d 649 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004).

STEVENSON, C.J., TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. Gordon, 932 So. 2d 393, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 6692, 2006 WL 1699503 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

932 So. 2d 393 (Gordon v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Crider
932 So. 2d 393 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)