Gordon v. Gandy Bridge Company, Etc.
This text of 7 So. 2d 350 (Gordon v. Gandy Bridge Company, Etc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In our opinion the allegations of inducement and of conclusions, if defective, do not render insufficient the unchallenged definite allegations of fact in the declaration, which clearly show an unsafe placé for plaintiff to work, and state a cause' of actionable negligence of the defendant. The servant does not assume the risk of hazards caused by the master’s negligence. The declaration does not show assumption of risk or contributory negligence by the plaintiff, so as to negative recovery.
The judgment should be and is hereby reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 So. 2d 350, 150 Fla. 28, 1941 Fla. LEXIS 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-gandy-bridge-company-etc-fla-1941.