Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Gordon v. Fortune Savings Bank

Gordon v. Fortune Savings Bank

561 So. 2d 30, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3306, 1990 WL 64150
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 16, 1990
DocketNo. 89-2775
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 561 So. 2d 30 (Gordon v. Fortune Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. Fortune Savings Bank, 561 So. 2d 30, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3306, 1990 WL 64150 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary final judgment entered in favor of Plaintiff, Fortune Savings Bank, and against Defendant, Joel P. Gordon, because there exists a genuine issue of material fact which precludes entry of summary judgment as a matter of law. That issue is whether or not Fortune Savings Bank was a holder in due course as concerns the promissory note in question that was assigned to it. Seinfeld v. Commercial Bank & Trust, 405 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent herewith.

WALDEN, GUNTHER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Keane v. Andrews
561 So. 2d 30 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
561 So. 2d 30, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3306, 1990 WL 64150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-fortune-savings-bank-fladistctapp-1990.