Gordon v. Faustos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gordon v. Faustos

304 A.D.2d 429, 757 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4194

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 17, 2003·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered May 22, 2002, which denied as untimely defendant Matos Faustos’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had not sustained serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant Faustos’s summary judgment motion was properly denied since the motion was not made within 120 days of the filing of plaintiffs note of issue and defendant offered no explanation for his delay (Borelli v Gegaj, 248 AD2d 299 [1998]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Esposito, J.), entered May 22, 2002, which denied as untimely defendant Matos Faustos’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had not sustained serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant Faustos’s summary judgment motion was properly denied since the motion was not made within 120 days of the filing of plaintiffs note of issue and defendant offered no explanation for his delay (Borelli v Gegaj, 248 AD2d 299 [1998]). Concur — Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Lerner, Friedman and Marlow, JJ.

Gordon v. Faustos, 304 A.D.2d 429, 757 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

304 A.D.2d 429 (Gordon v. Faustos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related