Gordon v. Evening Post Publishing Co.

66 N.Y.S. 828
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 66 N.Y.S. 828 (Gordon v. Evening Post Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gordon v. Evening Post Publishing Co., 66 N.Y.S. 828 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1900).

Opinion

McADAM, J.

The action is to recover $10,000 for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff December 8,. 1899, through defendant’s negligence. Under the name of William G. Bryant & Co., the defendant was organized under the manufacturing act of 1848. Its corporate existence, specified in the charter, expired January 1, 1900, and no extension of the life of the company has been granted. The corporate title was on November 7, 1881, changed to the Evening Post Publishing Company, its present name. The defendant’s charter having expired since the alleged injuries, were sustained, the action cannot he maintained thereafter against the defendant. Sturges v. Vanderbilt, 73 N. Y. 384. When the cause was called in its order for trial, the defendant, upon the ground stated, moved to strike the cause from the calendar. At common-, law the action would have abated. Ang. & A. Corp. (10th Ed.) § 778a; 5 Thomp. Corp. § 6723. But under our statutes it has been held there is no abatement in such case, and that the plaintiff may obtain an order permitting the continuance of the action against the directors as trustees. Marstaller v. Mills, 143 N. Y. 398, 38 N. E. 370; Hepworth v. Ferry Co., 62 Hun, 257, 16 N. Y. Supp. 692, appeal-dismissed in 131 N. Y. 645, 30 N. E. 867; People v. Troy Steel & Iron [829]*829Co., 82 Hun, 303, 31 N. Y. Supp. 337. Until so revived and continued the action will be marked “Abated” on the preferred calendar, which, in this instance, means that it does not in its present comatose condition belong to the day calendar. If, however, the plaintiff revives the action in a form that entitles it to be tried without any new application for a preference, the cause may resume its position on the day calendar, and be tried according to prescribed practice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marstaller v. . Mills
38 N.E. 370 (New York Court of Appeals, 1894)
Sturges v. . Vanderbilt
73 N.Y. 384 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)
Hepworth v. Union Ferry Co.
16 N.Y.S. 692 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)
People v. Troy Steel & Iron Co.
31 N.Y.S. 337 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
66 N.Y.S. 828, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-evening-post-publishing-co-nysupct-1900.