Gordon v. Doniff

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2010·No. 09-2185·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2185

CHRISTOPHER H. GORDON,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

and

BREWER K. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

KYLE L. DONIFF; EDWARD PRIMOFF; SLOCUM & BODDIE PC; ALIAREZA ALIASKARI; DARIA LAND GROUP LLC; ROBERT H. HILLMAN; MAGAZINE & HILLMAN PC; SHEA HICKMAN, Tenants; SUZANNE GORDON, Tenants; RICHARD FRANK BODDIE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08- cv-02802-RWT)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher H. Gordon, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Frank Boddie, SLOCUM & BODDIE, PC, Springfield, Virginia; Robert H. Hillman, MAGAZINE & HILLMAN, PC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees; Suzanne Gordon, Appellee Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Christopher H. Gordon appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to state a

claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. Gordon v. Doniff, No. 8:08-cv-02802-RWT (D. Md.

Sept. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gordon v. Doniff, (4th Cir. 2010).

Gordon v. Doniff (Gordon v. Doniff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.