Gordon v. Conley
This text of 54 F. App'x 156 (Gordon v. Conley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kevin M. Gordon, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend the court’s previous judgment accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gordon v. Conley, No. CA-99-204-5 (S.D.W.Va. July 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
To the extent Gordon appeals the district court order denying relief under § 2241, his notice of appeal is untimely.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F. App'x 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gordon-v-conley-ca4-2002.